My colleague Julie Kilmer, theologian and
ethicist, and I are in Myanmar for a consultation with Myanmar Institute of
Theology. We are here under the auspices
of the Arcus Foundation, which advocates for the concerns of sexual minorities. We are seeking to learn how churches find
resources to offer pastoral care and education to families who have LGBT
members.
This exploration
not only concerns churches and persons in Myanmar, but those who immigrate to
the US, where the hyper-sexualized culture becomes a great challenge. How can Central assist in cultural
assimilation, especially in navigating this radical difference? Of course, American churches are still
learning how to practice hospitality in this area, and we need such attentiveness,
also.
At dinner last evening, one of the professors
put it bluntly:
“We don’t talk about that here.” By “that,” he was referring to the presence of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people, who are known to be part of every ethnicity, every culture. It is understandable that such conversation be more sub rosa in a land where homosexuality is still illegal.
“We don’t talk about that here.” By “that,” he was referring to the presence of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people, who are known to be part of every ethnicity, every culture. It is understandable that such conversation be more sub rosa in a land where homosexuality is still illegal.
The church cannot be silent as countries and
governments wrestle with finding ways to make space for those who do not fit
the rather binary categories we prefer. Yesterday the news reported that
neighboring country Thailand is preparing for a constitutional amendment that
will recognize a “third gender,” referring to those persons who seek sexual
reassignment because of the lack of fit between one’s sense of identity and
one’s body. Of course, US news is
buzzing about the Supreme Court taking on the rights of same-sex couples.
Many faithful Christians are engaging this issue
with new insight gleaned from careful biblical study, contemporary social
science, medical/biological perspectives, and ethnographic studies. We are learning that simple etiological
arguments that call for condemnation of all sexual “irregularities” cannot
withstand critical engagement. Besides,
there is the human reality of violence, oppression, and shunning for those who
articulate their difference.
In this coming week, we will be doing fieldwork
as we explore with professors, students, Baptist leaders, and NGO’s who
advocate for sexual minorities, the shifting ground here. Our task is not to impose “solutions” for
this culture, shaped by Buddhist patriarchal asceticism, is far different from
the social landscape at home.
Yet, common questions emerge about justice,
welcome, protection under the law, and human dignity. We will conduct our study and conversation
with respect and empathy as we learn more about the state of the issue
here. Imposing a North American
interpretive framework would be disrespectful; ignoring a pastoral issue would
be irresponsible. I trust we will
navigate the theological and cultural waters with care and discernment. I also trust that we can move the discussion
forward, both here and at home.
Molly T. Marshall
Central prepares women and men for seeking God, shaping church, and
serving humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment